Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 12, No. 1, January-February 2001, pp. 1-18
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.12.1.1.10120
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pitcher, P.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Top Management Team Heterogeneity: Personality, Power, and Proxies

Patricia Pitcher, Anne D. Smith

Hautes Études Commerciales, 3000 chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 2A7
The University of New Mexico, Anderson Schools of Management, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131

patricia.pitcher{at}hec.ca
asmith{at}anderson.unm.edu

This article reports partial results of an eight-year field study of the Top Management Teams (TMTs) of a global multidivisional financial services corporation and compares those results with large-sample work in the TMT literature. In particular, it investigates the operationalization of TMT cognitive diversity by the proxies of age, team tenure, industry experience, and functional background heterogeneity most often used in statistical work, and compares those operationalizations with cognitive diversity itself. In addition to highlighting which proxies seemed to most closely approximate cognitive diversity and why, it demonstrates the confounding impact of power on all operationalizations. A comparison of the field results with three representative studies with respect to the operationalization of the dependent variables of diversification, innovation, and performance helps to explain why previous TMT heterogeneity research has often produced inconsistent results or nonfindings. It offers some suggestions that should improve the robustness of statistical research and demonstrates the reciprocal usefulness of case and large-sample research.

Key Words: Top Management Team; Personality; Power
History: Received: May 5, 2000;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
C. Boone and W. Hendriks
Top Management Team Diversity and Firm Performance: Moderators of Functional-Background and Locus-of-Control Diversity
Management Science, February 1, 2009; 55(2): 165 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
R. P. Wright
Eliciting Cognitions of Strategizing Using Advanced Repertory Grids in a World Constructed and Reconstructed
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2008; 11(4): 753 - 769.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
S. Wang and Y. He
Compensating Nondedicated Cross-Functional Teams
Organization Science, September 1, 2008; 19(5): 753 - 765.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
J. Mathieu, M. T. Maynard, T. Rapp, and L. Gilson
Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future
Journal of Management, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 410 - 476.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
M. A. Carpenter, M. A. Geletkanycz, and Wm. G. Sanders
Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition
Journal of Management, December 1, 2004; 30(6): 749 - 778.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
V. Kisfalvi and P. Pitcher
Doing What Feels Right: The Influence of CEO Character and Emotions on Top Management Team Dynamics
Journal of Management Inquiry, March 1, 2003; 12(1): 42 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by INFORMS.