Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 14, No. 2, March-April 2003, pp. 137-148
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.14.2.137.14989
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parboteeah, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Cullen, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Social Institutions and Work Centrality: Explorations Beyond National Culture

K. Praveen Parboteeah, John B. Cullen

Management Department, University of Wisconsin, Whitewater, Wisconsin 53190
Department of Management and Decision Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164–4736

parbotek{at}mail.uww.edu
cullenj{at}cbe.wsu.edu

In spite of the popularity of institutional explanations of organizational form, most international management research uses dimensions of national culture to explain cross–national differences in individual work centrality. In this study, we show that social institutions explain variance in work centrality in addition to Hofstede's (2001) dimensions of national culture. Using individual–level data from 30,270 interview respondents from the World Value Survey and institutional data for their 26 countries, we developed hypotheses to investigate whether selected social institutions (i.e., socialism, union strength, educational accessibility, social inequality, and industrialization) affect individual work centrality. We tested our cross–level hypotheses using Hierarchical Linear Modeling. Findings showed that all of the social institutional variables studied predicted lower work centrality.

Key Words: Work Centrality; Social Institutions; National Culture



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
K. P. Parboteeah, Y. Paik, and J. B. Cullen
Religious Groups and Work Values: A Focus on Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, and Islam
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, April 1, 2009; 9(1): 51 - 67.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
K. Praveen Parboteeah, M. Hoegl, and J. Cullen
Religious dimensions and work obligation: A country institutional profile model
Human Relations, January 1, 2009; 62(1): 119 - 148.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
A. S. Tsui, S. S. Nifadkar, and Amy Yi Ou
Cross-National, Cross-Cultural Organizational Behavior Research: Advances, Gaps, and Recommendations
Journal of Management, June 1, 2007; 33(3): 426 - 478.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
H. M. Addae and K. P. Parboteeah
Organizational Information, Organizational Commitment and Intention to Quit: A Study of Trinidad and Tobago
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, December 1, 2006; 6(3): 343 - 359.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
K. P. Parboteeah, J. W. Bronson, and J. B. Cullen
Does National Culture Affect Willingness to Justify Ethically Suspect Behaviors?: A Focus on the GLOBE National Culture Scheme
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, August 1, 2005; 5(2): 123 - 138.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by INFORMS.