|
|
||||||||
Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, 701 Tappan Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1234
This paper argues that research in organization theory has seen a shift in orientation from paradigm-driven work to problem-driven work since the late 1980s. A number of paradigms for the study of organizations were elaborated during the mid-1970s, including transaction cost economics, resource dependence theory, organizational ecology, new institutional theory, and agency theory in financial economics. These approaches reflected the dominant trends of the large corporations of their time: increasing concentration, diversification, and bureaucratization. However, subsequent shifts in organizational boundaries, the increased use of alliances and network forms, and the expanding role of financial markets in shaping organizational decision making all make normal science driven by the internally derived questions from these paradigms less fruitful. Instead, we argue that problem-driven work that uses mechanism-based theorizing and research that takes the field rather than the organization as the unit of analysis are the most appropriate styles of organizational research under conditions of major economic changesuch as our own era. This sort of work is best exemplified by various studies under the rubric of institutional theory in the past 15 years, which are reviewed here.
Harvard Business School, Morgan Hall 312, Boston, Massachusetts 02163
gfdavis{at}umich.edu
cmarquis{at}hbs.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Dingwerth and P. Pattberg World Politics and Organizational Fields: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance European Journal of International Relations, December 1, 2009; 15(4): 707 - 743. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Wright Domination in Organizational Fields: It's Just Not Cricket Organization, November 1, 2009; 16(6): 855 - 885. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Grant and T. D. Wall The Neglected Science and Art of Quasi-Experimentation: Why-to, When-to, and How-to Advice for Organizational Researchers Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2009; 12(4): 653 - 686. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Bastedo Conflicts, Commitments, and Cliques in the University: Moral Seduction as a Threat to Trustee Independence American Educational Research Journal, June 1, 2009; 46(2): 354 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Marti, D. Etzion, and B. Leca Theoretical Approaches for Studying Corporations, Democracy, and the Public Good Journal of Management Inquiry, September 1, 2008; 17(3): 148 - 151. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. V. Aguilera, I. Filatotchev, H. Gospel, and G. Jackson An Organizational Approach to Comparative Corporate Governance: Costs, Contingencies, and Complementarities Organization Science, May 1, 2008; 19(3): 475 - 492. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Jelinek, A. G. L. Romme, and R. J. Boland Introduction to the Special Issue: Organization Studies as a Science for Design: Creating Collaborative Artifacts and Research Organization Studies, March 1, 2008; 29(3): 317 - 329. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Murray and S. O'Mahony Exploring the Foundations of Cumulative Innovation: Implications for Organization Science Organization Science, November 1, 2007; 18(6): 1006 - 1021. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Baker and T. G. Pollock Making the marriage work: the benefits of strategy's takeover of entrepreneurship for strategic organization Strategic Organization, August 1, 2007; 5(3): 297 - 312. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Khurana and C. Marquis Diagnosing and Dissolving Our "Translation Gap" Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1, 2006; 15(4): 406 - 409. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Wooten Soapbox : Editorial essays: Race and strategic organization Strategic Organization, May 1, 2006; 4(2): 191 - 199. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Meyer, V. Gaba, and K. A. Colwell Organizing Far from Equilibrium: Nonlinear Change in Organizational Fields Organization Science, September 1, 2005; 16(5): 456 - 473. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pfeffer and C. T. Fong Building Organization Theory from First Principles: The Self-Enhancement Motive and Understanding Power and Influence Organization Science, July 1, 2005; 16(4): 372 - 388. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |