Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 17, No. 4, July-August 2006, pp. 418-435
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0195
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Metiu, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Owning the Code: Status Closure in Distributed Groups

Anca Metiu

INSEAD, Boulevard de Constance, Fontainebleau Cedex 77305, France
anca.metiu{at}insead.edu

An ethnographic study of a team of software developers working on a new product across two groups—located on the West Coast of the United States and in Bangalore, India—is used to analyze status dynamics in distributed groups. Whereas existing literature has emphasized the importance of communication, task design, and incentives for cooperation, this paper shows how status differentials and geographic distance reinforce each other to affect the work processes and collaboration in distributed teams. The focus is on two elements: the relationship between the collaboration across the two groups and their members and the members’ interpretations of this relationship. Status influences the perceptions of the remote group, as well as the willingness to cooperate with its members. The key findings specify the informal closure strategies used by the high-status group in relation to the low-status group. Furthermore, the superimposition of geographic and status distance in remote work lowered the cost of exclusion of one group from the collaboration and led to the deepening of status differences between remote groups. By showing status to be both an input and an output of intergroup relations, the paper specifies some of the mechanisms through which status orderings are maintained and reinforced.

Key Words: status closure; distributed groups; intergroup relations



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
A. Hemetsberger and C. Reinhardt
Collective Development in Open-Source Communities: An Activity Theoretical Perspective on Successful Online Collaboration
Organization Studies, September 1, 2009; 30(9): 987 - 1008.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
N. Pisani
International Management Research: Investigating its Recent Diffusion in Top Management Journals
Journal of Management, March 1, 2009; 35(2): 199 - 218.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
J. M. Wilson, M. Boyer O'Leary, A. Metiu, and Q. R. Jett
Perceived Proximity in Virtual Work: Explaining the Paradox of Far-but-Close
Organization Studies, July 1, 2008; 29(7): 979 - 1002.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.