Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 17, No. 4, July-August 2006, pp. 470-483
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0193
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elsbach, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hargadon, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Enhancing Creativity Through "Mindless" Work: A Framework of Workday Design

Kimberly D. Elsbach, Andrew B. Hargadon

Graduate School of Management, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616
Graduate School of Management, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616

kdelsbach{at}ucdavis.edu
abhargadon{at}ucdavis.edu

We propose that organizations use a new framework of workday design to enhance the creativity of today’s chronically overworked professionals. Although insights from creativity research have been integrated into models of work design to increase the stimulants of creativity (e.g., intrinsic motivation), this has not led to work design models that have effectively reduced the obstacles to creativity (e.g., workload pressures). As a consequence, creative output among professionals in high-workload contexts remains disappointing. In response, we offer a framework of work design that focuses on the design of entire workdays rather than the typical focus on designing either specific tasks or very broad job descriptions (e.g., as the job characteristics model in Hackman et al. 1975). Furthermore, we introduce the concept of "mindless" work (i.e., work that is low in both cognitive difficulty and performance pressures) as an integral part of this framework. We suggest that to enhance creativity among chronically overworked professionals, workdays should be designed to alternate between bouts of cognitively challenging and high-pressure work (as suggested in the original model by Hackman et al. 1975), and bouts of mindless work (as defined in this paper). We discuss the implications of our framework for theories of work design and creativity.

Key Words: creativity; job design; job stress



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
N. Madjar and C. E. Shalley
Multiple Tasks' and Multiple Goals' Effect on Creativity: Forced Incubation or Just a Distraction?
Journal of Management, August 1, 2008; 34(4): 786 - 805.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
S. M. B. Thatcher and L. L. Greer
Does It Really Matter If You Recognize Who I Am? The Implications of Identity Comprehension for Individuals in Work Teams{dagger}
Journal of Management, February 1, 2008; 34(1): 5 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.