|
|
||||||||
Graduate School of Management, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616
We propose that organizations use a new framework of workday design to enhance the creativity of todays chronically overworked professionals. Although insights from creativity research have been integrated into models of work design to increase the stimulants of creativity (e.g., intrinsic motivation), this has not led to work design models that have effectively reduced the obstacles to creativity (e.g., workload pressures). As a consequence, creative output among professionals in high-workload contexts remains disappointing. In response, we offer a framework of work design that focuses on the design of entire workdays rather than the typical focus on designing either specific tasks or very broad job descriptions (e.g., as the job characteristics model in Hackman et al. 1975). Furthermore, we introduce the concept of "mindless" work (i.e., work that is low in both cognitive difficulty and performance pressures) as an integral part of this framework. We suggest that to enhance creativity among chronically overworked professionals, workdays should be designed to alternate between bouts of cognitively challenging and high-pressure work (as suggested in the original model by Hackman et al. 1975), and bouts of mindless work (as defined in this paper). We discuss the implications of our framework for theories of work design and creativity.
Graduate School of Management, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616
kdelsbach{at}ucdavis.edu
abhargadon{at}ucdavis.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Madjar and C. E. Shalley Multiple Tasks' and Multiple Goals' Effect on Creativity: Forced Incubation or Just a Distraction? Journal of Management, August 1, 2008; 34(4): 786 - 805. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. B. Thatcher and L. L. Greer Does It Really Matter If You Recognize Who I Am? The Implications of Identity Comprehension for Individuals in Work Teams{dagger} Journal of Management, February 1, 2008; 34(1): 5 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |