Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 17, No. 5, September-October 2006, pp. 527-544
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0204
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wade, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pollock, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Overpaid CEOs and Underpaid Managers: Fairness and Executive Compensation

James B. Wade, Charles A. O'Reilly, III, Timothy G. Pollock

Rutgers Business School, Rutgers University, 111 Washington Street, Newark, New Jersey 01702-3027
Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
Smeal College of Business, Pennsylvania State University, 417 Business Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802

jwade{at}rbsmail.rutgers.edu
coreilly{at}stanford.edu
tpollock{at}psu.edu

In this study we propose that norms of fairness are salient to top decision makers and show that over- or underpayment of the CEO cascades down to lower organizational levels. Moreover, it appears that CEOs use their own power not only to increase their own salaries, but also those of their subordinates. One implication of such a process may be that the overpayment of a top executive has higher costs than have previously been realized. We also find evidence suggesting that CEOs serve as a key referent for employees in determining whether their own situation is "fair," and this influences their reactions to their own compensation. More specifically, we find that when lower-level managers are underpaid relative to the CEO—that is, underpaid more than the CEO or overpaid less—they are more likely to leave the organization. Results obtained from testing our hypotheses on a sample of more than 120 firms over a five-year period demonstrates the importance of considering fairness in the setting of CEO pay. Implications for the design of executive compensation packages are discussed.

Key Words: executive compensation; equity; fairness; top management teams; corporate governance; turnover; power



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
C. E. Devers, G. McNamara, R. M. Wiseman, and M. Arrfelt
Moving Closer to the Action: Examining Compensation Design Effects on Firm Risk
Organization Science, July 1, 2008; 19(4): 548 - 566.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
S. D. Graffin, J. B. Wade, J. F. Porac, and R. C. McNamee
The Impact of CEO Status Diffusion on the Economic Outcomes of Other Senior Managers
Organization Science, May 1, 2008; 19(3): 457 - 474.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
C. E. Devers, A. A. Cannella JR, G. P. Reilly, and M. E. Yoder
Executive Compensation: A Multidisciplinary Review of Recent Developments
Journal of Management, December 1, 2007; 33(6): 1016 - 1072.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.