Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 17, No. 5, September-October 2006, pp. 637-656
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0202
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, S.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Mahmood, I. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

When and How Does Business Group Affiliation Promote Firm Innovation? A Tale of Two Emerging Economies

Sea-Jin Chang, Chi-Nien Chung, Ishtiaq P. Mahmood

School of Business Administration, Korea University, Sungbukku Anamdang, Seoul, Korea 136-701
Department of Management and Organization, NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117592
Department of Business Policy, NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117592

schang{at}korea.ac.kr
bizccn{at}nus.edu.sg
bizipm{at}nus.edu.sg

Using a comparative institutional perspective, we explore whether business groups’ roles in facilitating affiliate firms’ innovation varies by country and time period. We compare the innovativeness of firms affiliated with business groups to that of independent firms in two emerging economies: South Korea and Taiwan. On average, business group affiliates outperform independent firms in South Korea, but not in Taiwan, and in the early 1990s, but not in the late 1990s. The existence of alternative institutional infrastructures for innovation might explain these differences. Groups’ abilities to share technological knowledge and financial resources among affiliates enables them to create value by promoting innovation in emerging economies, but groups’ diversification might inhibit individual affiliates’ innovativeness.

Key Words: business groups; innovation; comparative institutional perspective; emerging economies



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
C.-N. Chung and X. Luo
Institutional Logics or Agency Costs: The Influence of Corporate Governance Models on Business Group Restructuring in Emerging Economies
Organization Science, September 1, 2008; 19(5): 766 - 784.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
H. Kim, H. Kim, and P. M. Lee
Ownership Structure and the Relationship Between Financial Slack and R&D Investments: Evidence from Korean Firms
Organization Science, May 1, 2008; 19(3): 404 - 418.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.